Akaka bill updates

topic posted Sat, June 10, 2006 - 12:19 PM by  Unsubscribed
Share/Save/Bookmark
Advertisement
Aloha kakou,
Clarence Kukauakahi Ching, a member of this tribe, was with Leon Siu and 'Ehu Cardwell, lobbying against the Akaka bill in Washington this last week. Mahalo nui loa for their efforts to prevent a really misguided attempt to bring justice to na kanaka maoli. The Akaka bill has serious flaws, both in premise and in how it proposes to redress the great wrongs done to Native Hawaiians and descendents of Hawaiian nationals (non-native citizens of the Hawaiian monarchy).
-----------

1.
Senate to consider letting Hawaiians pursue sovereignty
Posted by: "Hawaii Nation Info" info@hawaii-nation.org hawaiination
Wed Jun 7, 2006 12:06 am (PST)

www.washtimes.com/functions/print.php

The Washington Times
www.washingtontimes.com
Published June 7, 2006

Senate to consider letting Hawaiians pursue sovereignty

By Brian DeBose

THE WASHINGTON TIMES

Advertisement

Hawaii Sen. Daniel K. Akaka thinks Hawaiians
should be allowed to govern themselves as Native
Americans and Alaskans do, and after seven years
of pushing a bill to start the process, the
Senate is expected to take it up this week.

Mr. Akaka says the bill is a way to give
"indigenous" Hawaiians a sense of pride and a
chance for sovereignty for the first time since
1893, when Queen Liliuokalani was deposed and
lands were illegally seized by U.S. Marines and a
cadre of sugar-plantation businessmen.

"For the first time, if it passes, Hawaiians will
have parity and be able to form a government
entity to address their concerns, since the
overthrow," Mr. Akaka said.

Republican senators annually have blocked the
legislation, saying it would violate the
Constitution by establishing a sovereign
race-based government. It is only coming up now
through a deal worked out between Democratic and
Republican leaders to move other bills.

Opponents, including many native Hawaiians, say
the bill opens up a "Pandora's box" of new race
classifications and called the bill ambiguous as
to what benefits it will bring.

The bill calls for an Office of Native Hawaiian
Relations in the Department of the Interior, and
a Native Hawaiian Interagency Coordinating Group
to administer programs, a commission that would
certify who are indigenous Hawaiians, and
provides a process of reorganization of the
Native Hawaiian governing entity.

"The bill will not authorize gaming in Hawaii.
The bill will not allow private lands to be
taken. The bill will not create a reservation in
Hawaii," Mr. Akaka said.

The legislation is supported by both Republican
and Democratic senators, primarily those from
states with substantial Native American and
Eskimo populations, as well as the American Bar
Association and Alaska Federation of Natives.

Sen. Jon Kyl, Arizona Republican, who has kept
the bill from coming to the floor, said the
creation of a native Hawaiian government --
composed only of redefined natives and whose
members can only be voted in by native Hawaiians
-- could divide Hawaii's people.

"Unlike reservation Indians, Native Hawaiians do
not live in one area of the State that is set
aside for Indians; they live in the same cities
and neighborhoods and on the same streets, as
other Hawaiians do," Mr. Kyl said.

Reservation Indian tribes have the power to tax,
regulate and make laws for members. There are an
estimated 400,000 Native Hawaiians living
throughout the United States.

Native Hawaiians also say it "too narrowly" redefines who is indigenous.

"It is only for people of Native Hawaiian blood,"
said 'Ehu Kekahu Cardwell, director of the Koani
Foundation, a grass-roots group dedicated to
restoring the Hawaiian nation.

"We want it to be for any descendants of kingdom
nationals who were loyal to the queen during the
time she was deposed. We want everyone to be able
to have a say in how this turns out," Mr.
Cardwell said.

Leon Siu, a Chinese Hawaiian lobbying against the
bill on Capitol Hill, said it has already caused
division in Hawaii.

"We reject a race issue being brought into our
community; the bill will change the definition of
who we are," he said. "Native Hawaiian is not a
pure bloodline and ... this bill will introduce a
new concept of racial apartheid."

Mr. Siu's father fled China in search of a better
life and settled in Hawaii 70 years ago, as did
hundreds of thousands of foreign nationals from
America, Japan, China, Vietnam, and the
Philippines who became Hawaiian citizens.

The Hawaiian monarchy historically never kept
anyone from participating in its government
structure and did not have a race-specific
citizenship definition.

One of the most salient points in the debate will
be a history lesson on how Hawaii became a U.S.
territory and a state, which Native Hawaiians say
was an "illegal annexation."

Queen Liliuokalani, the last Hawaiian monarch,
was deposed in 1893 by a collection of sugar
exporters doing business on the island with the
complicity of the U.S. government.

Hawaii became a U.S. territory under a
congressional resolution passed in the late
1890s, but the Constitution states that the U.S.
can only acquire land held by sovereign foreign
nations through a formal treaty.

The treaty authorized by the Safety Commission --
an illegitimate government established by the
sugar plantation owners -- failed in Congress
after 38,000 of the 40,000 natives living on the
island in 1897 petitioned the Congress to reject
it.

Congress formally acknowledged that the coup was
unlawful in an apology resolution in 1993.

"This is just the next step in that process of
acknowledging the wrong committed against the
Native Hawaiian people and recognize them as a
sovereign entity," said Donalyn Dela Cruz,
spokeswoman for Mr. Akaka.

Copyright © 2006 News World Communications, Inc. All rights reserved.
Copyright The Washington Times
posted by:
Unsubscribed
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • Unsu...
     
    Aloha kakou,
    Once again I want to acknowledge Scott Crawford and his Hawaiian Kingdom blog, as well as the activists on the Hawaii-Independence Yahoo List. They are tireless in getting the word out about important issues. Mahalo nui loa!
    ------------

    the.honoluluadvertiser.com/arti...html/

    The Honolulu Advertiser
    Posted at 5:19 p.m., Wednesday, June 7, 2006

    Justice Department advises Senate to reject Akaka bill
    >
    > By Gordon Y.K. Pang
    > Advertiser Staff Writer
    >
    > On the eve of a crucial vote, the U.S. Department
    > of Justice late today issued a letter to Senate
    > leaders stating that the Bush Administration
    > "strongly opposes" passage of the Native Hawaiian
    > Government Reorganization Act, better known as
    > the Akaka bill.
    >
    > Assistant Attorney General William E. Moschella
    > cited a report issued last month by the U.S.
    > Civil Rights Commission recommending that
    > senators reject the bill, which initiates a
    > process that would lay the groundwork toward
    > establishing of a federally recognized Native
    > Hawaiian entity.
    >
    > The report, Moschella noted, said the bill could
    > lead to "further subdivide(ing) the American
    > people into discrete subgroups accorded varying
    > degrees of privilege."
    >
    > Moschella's two-paragraph letter was addressed to
    > Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist. A copy was
    > sent to Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid, who
    > leads the Democratic caucus. A cloture vote set
    > for tomorrow will determine whether the Akaka
    > bill will finally get a Senate vote after a
    > number of failed attempts over the last six years.
    >
    > Moschella also cited a quote from Bush that said
    > "we must ... honor the great American tradition
    > of the melting pot." Moschella wrote: "This bill
    > would reverse that great American tradition and
    > divide people by their race."
    >
    > Supporters of the Akaka bill say the bill goes a
    > long way toward rectifying the wrongs of the
    > overthrow of the Hawaiian monarchy and is
    > necessary to stave off legal challenges raised
    > against programs that give preference to
    > Hawaiians. Some opponents counter that it flies
    > against the concept of equal treatment for all in
    > order to discriminate in favor of Hawaiians.
    > Other opponents maintain that the bill does not
    > go far enough in addressing wrongs tied to the
    > overthrow.
    >
    > Office of Hawaiian Affairs Administrator Clyde
    > Namu'o said while he was disappointed with
    > Moschella's letter, it is the Office of
    > Management and Budget and not the Justice
    > Department, that speaks for President Bush.
    >
    > Further, Namu'o said, it is OHA's understanding
    > that Moschella's letter was based on the current
    > draft of the Akaka bill and not a proposed
    > amended version of the bill designed to address
    > the concerns raised by the Justice Department and
    > other opponents.
    >
    > Reach Gordon Y.K. Pang at
    > gpang@honoluluadvertiser.com or at 525-8026.
    >
    >
    > © COPYRIGHT 2006 The Honolulu Advertiser, a division
    > of Gannett Co. Inc.
    • Unsu...
       
      This is from Ku, posted to HI Independence list:

      > Hi Folks
      >
      > The need for a "stealth" operation in the u.s.
      > senate is over - and I can tell some of the stories
      > from the Hill.
      >
      > CAUTION: The info included here is based on what
      > things look like from our observations and from the
      > observations of others that we have been talking to.
      > On the other hand, trying to predict the future
      > from this kind of info is very difficult. So - the
      > things said here must be taken with a grain of salt
      > and with the knowledge that I may be sticking my
      > neck out too far. So please understand - I'm just
      > trying to share my best thoughts at this time.
      >
      > Leon Siu and I went to work on Monday morning -
      > visiting as many Republican senators as possible to
      > give them reasons why they shouldn't vote "for" the
      > akaka bill. The number of votes that akaka needed
      > for cloture is 60 - so we were working on the 41
      > needed to make it fail.
      >
      > We had a guy (name and source not to be mentioned at
      > this time) who had worked for a couple of senators
      > in the past, and had also been a lobbyist act as our
      > guide. The bottom line - he helped us preserve our
      > nation.
      >
      > Leon and I were joined on Tuesday by Kili Kekumano.
      > We again pounded the pavement.
      >
      > By Wednesday (it is around 1:00 a.m. (Washington
      > time now) - we had made it through all of the
      > "target" senators on our list. We had mixed results
      > as can be expected. We tried to speak (in person)
      > with those staff members who were handling the
      > "Hawaiian" bill for their senators.
      >
      > We then switched (on Wednesday) to "Democratic"
      > senators that were possible "turncoats." One of
      > them was Nelson (from Nebraska I think) - that we
      > couldn't get any reading on - but we were asked to
      > leave any materials we had with his office.
      >
      > The chinks in akaka's armor came as a big surprise.
      > Senators Lieberman and Kennedy were against the
      > bill. However, we couldn't find out if they would
      > vote "No" on the cloture vote - or on the final
      > vote. At this point - any negative vote at any time
      > was welcome. Inouye and akaka had counted "every"
      > democratic senator in their tally - to pass cloture
      > - and they were right at the necessary number -at
      > least this is what we were told.
      >
      > So - 2 turncoats would really ruin akaka's chances -
      > unless the republicans would have turncoats that
      > would change the numbers around.
      >
      > The "3 musketeers" were favored to be able to attend
      > planning meeetings of the staff persons of
      > "conservative republicans" and so were privy to the
      > plans and strategies that were being readied for the
      > cloture vote and any subsequent action.
      >
      > Such discussions included strategy on amendments
      > that republican senators were planning in case
      > cloture should fail - and there was even talk of a
      > filibuster.
      >
      > On Wednesday afternoon - we were favored by being
      > included in a press conference put on by 2
      > republican senators (one from Texas and one from
      > Tennessee), the chair of the civil rights entity
      > that had put out the "negative" recommendation about
      > akaka about a week or so ago. 2 opposing Hawaiians
      > were also included - Leon Siu and Sandy (wife of
      > Bill Burgess).
      >
      > By the way - politics surely does result in getting
      > in bed with strange bedfellows. So - excuse please.
      >
      > After the press conference - Kili and I were
      > interviewed by reporters for the Honolulu
      > Advertiser and Channel 9. So - take a look at
      > Channel 9 news at 10. We might be on.
      >
      > Anyway - one of the Danners (and others) were at
      > this press conference. The visual daggers that were
      > being thrown couldn't have killed an entire
      > battalion. However, the thought that was going
      > through my mind was a remark that one of the Danners
      > had made to Soli at one of their "controlled"
      > workshops (pro akaka) was - if you want to talk
      > about opposing akaka - then do your own workshop.
      > Well - we were in our "own" "workshop" and we were
      > making the best of it.
      >
      > Anyway - our "guide" and his organization made all
      > the arrangements for our participation in "all" the
      > activities we were involved in. Things were moving
      > in mysterious ways this entire week.
      >
      > One of the things that we heard that might have
      > clarified the situation was the possibility that the
      > white house would say something. Anyway - as of
      > Tuesday - things weren't decided whether the white
      > house was going to move or not. The "nerve center"
      > we were on the edge of was working with the white
      > house.
      >
      > Anyway - tonight (Wednesday) - the white house came
      > out "against" the bill. And this action - and the
      > democrats that are bailing just about seals the
      > bill's fate (I think).
      >
      > As far as those of us who are in the trenches here
      > are concerned - the death knell of akaka has been
      > rung - but this is one of those places that I really
      > am sticking my neck out.
      >
      > OHA has pulled out all the stops. They are bringing
      > many hawaiian homesteaders, hawaiian civic club
      > people, anybody they can find.
      >
      > We passed Lingle in the hall on Tuesday. She was
      > facing into the hallway wall - with a cell phone.
      > She didn't see us.
      >
      > Today (Wednesday) - we spotted Haunani Apoliona -
      > coming out of a seclused office - and, although we
      > saw her, she didn't see us. It's just like playing
      > cat and mouse - but makes things interesting. We
      > didn't want OHA knowing that they were up against a
      > small bunch of dedicated oppositionl. This was why
      > I sent the email the other day - talking about going
      > to a strange planet.
      >
      > OHA had scheduled a reception for Tuesday night (we
      > think). Of course - we weren't invited. OHA is
      > sponsoring a rally for 9 a.m. on Thursday. Kili and
      > I are going to be there. Leon has to leave for home
      > before this happening and we will miss him. We will
      > be there - if only to watch those supporters as
      > they unknowingly celebrate the "death" of akaka.
      >
      > I just hope that this prophesy (an educated guess)
      > comes true.
      >
      > a hui hou
      >
      > ku
      > In DC
      >
      >

Recent topics in "Hawaiian Culture and Independence"