Bush administration 'strongly opposes' Hawaiian recognition bill

topic posted Tue, October 23, 2007 - 11:05 AM by  White
Share/Save/Bookmark
Advertisement
HONOLULU: The Bush administration "strongly opposes" a House of Representatives bill that would grant federal recognition to Native Hawaiians, calling the measure discriminatory and divisive.

The White House Office of Management and Budget on Monday said the measure supported by nearly every elected Hawaii official would reverse the American melting pot, divide governing institutions and raise constitutional concerns by separating Americans into race-related classifications.

"The administration strongly opposes any bill that would formally divide sovereign United States power along suspect lines of race and ethnicity," the White House said in a statement.

The bill, to be heard on the House floor Wednesday, is identical to the Senate's so-called Akaka bill, named after its sponsoring Hawaii Sen. Daniel Akaka.

The bill, which has failed in several previous attempts to get it through Congress, is designed to secure for Native Hawaiians the same self-governance rights held by American Indians and Alaska Natives. It provides a broad framework for creating a Hawaiian government responsible for managing about 2 million acres (810,000 hectares) of former Hawaiian lands and $15 million (€10.6 million) per year in ceded land revenue.
Today in Americas
Southern California fires made worse by high winds and heat
Shuttle launches despite bad weather
Companies seeking immunity donate to U.S. senator

If passed and eventually presented to President George W. Bush, his senior advisers would recommend a veto, the White House said.

"The president has eschewed such divisive legislation as a matter of policy, noting that 'we must ... honor the great American tradition of the melting pot, which has made us one nation out of many peoples,'" the statement said.

The White House cited a recommendation by the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, which urged that Congress reject the bill because it would discriminate on the basis of race and "further subdivide the American people into discrete subgroups accorded varying degrees of privilege."

The House version was introduced by Rep. Neil Abercrombie, a Democrat, and co-sponsored by five other representatives: Democrats Raul Grijalva, of Arizona, Hawaii's Mazie Hirono and Virginia's James Moran, along with Republicans Tom Cole of Oklahoma and Donald Young of Alaska. Delegates Madeleine Bordallo, a Democrat representing Guam, and Eni Faleomavaega, a Democrat representing American Samoa, are also signed on as co-sponsor.

Abercrombie and Hirono, in a joint statement, stressed that the Native Hawaiian Government Reorganization Act does not create a program or entitlement, require an appropriation, nor turn over assets of the U.S. government. It also does not give anyone title to anything they do not already own, the Hawaii Democrats said.

They said it simply provides a method for Hawaii to divest itself of requirements for administering land and dollar assets to a native entity, which will take full responsibility. The House members said Native Hawaiians would be able to decide for themselves the organization of the government entity to represent their interests in a relationship with the U.S. government.

"The relationship parallels that of Native Americans tribes and Alaskan Natives," they said.

The White House argued Native Hawaiians cannot be compared with other indigenous peoples, given the "substantial historical and cultural differences."

"The administration believes that tribal recognition is inappropriate and unwise for Native Hawaiians and would raise serious constitutional concerns," the White House said.

Last year, the measure was held up in the Senate on a procedural vote amid concerns from Republicans that it could lead to race-based privileges in a state known for its diversity. The Bush administration also questioned some provisions of the bill, despite strong support from Hawaii's Republican governor, Linda Lingle.

There are about 400,000 people of Native Hawaiian ancestry nationwide, and 260,000 of them live in Hawaii. No one would be required to join a Hawaiian government if the Akaka bill is approved.

___

On the Net:

HR 505: www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd
posted by:
posted by:
White
Massachusetts
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • Dan
    Dan
    offline 1
    --The White House argued Native Hawaiians cannot be compared with other indigenous peoples, given the "substantial historical and cultural differences."--

    Is there someone in the White House who believes this is actually a valid argument? To say the kanaka maoli cannot be compared to the natives of the North American continent based on a difference of history and culture is asinine. It is true, the cultures are different from the Inuit and the native American Tribes because they are a different people. It is true, their histories are different because again they are a different people. However what does a difference in history and culture has nothing to do with the FACT that the kanaka maoli are indigenous to Hawai`i. They were not brought there by other people. They were not introduced. They are not invasive. They made their way there just as all the other indigenous plants and animal life did by crossing the ocean and blowing on the winds. To believe in this argument seems to support the notion that no other native population can be considered indigenous, if their histories and cultures are not identical to the Inuit and native American Tribes. Given this statement I am very curious to learn what the White House's definition of an indigenous people is and what would validate a legitimate comparison.

    dan
  • I have something radical to say, but I have an explanation for my opinion that may be useful to anyone that reads this. Please keep an open mind and just hear me out. If someone thinks I’m wrong, please don’t get mad, just keep talking so that we can all grow together.

    I think the Akaka Bill is racist – and I’m a Hawaiian and I’m pretty damn sure I want that bill to go through (after thinking and debating about this thing for what seems like forever now), although at times I still have my doubts.
    First – this is why I think it’s racist. So – we’re going to set up this government, right? A government is considered the “state” for a nation. Under international human rights law – and under the natural law that all good people know – people have a right to choose their nationality. A state further has a right to say some people are considered treasonous and have them expelled (by some method) from not only the rights guaranteed by that state, but also the very nation or geographical borders that nation has defined. Also a nation has a right to restrict entrance into a nation based on that nation’s ability and desire to incorporate new members, such incorporation often based on that person’s ability to contribute to the nation.

    Racism is to discriminate between people based on ancestry and then act on those perceived differences (just to make it simple cuz some people have made a life’s effort to say what race even is).

    One of the biggest blocks to the Hawaiian governing entity (which will evolve into a nation) outlined in the Akaka Bill is based, not on whether or not a person would be a desirable candidate of Hawaiian Nationality, but in ALL cases, whether or not that person is of Hawaiian descent. It doesn’t matter how desirable they are to the nation or how long their loyalties have stood with our nation, if they’re not of Hawaiian descent, they automatically are blocked. That is racism – plain and true. I know that sounds bad to say, but take out all the history and the anger I know we hold for the wrongs done to us and just think for a second about what would happen if there were people among us (which I know there are) who are wholly and truly loyal to the Hawaiian people and our culture – who would stick by us to the bitter end if need be – and we say to them, you have no nationality. That is like telling someone you love that they are a stranger…and it’s all based on RACE. You ever get that feeling like no ha`ole could ever love Hawaii as much as us? Racism…and maybe I can show why.

    BUT first, I just want to say that under the historical circumstances and by living in a Eurocentric world, I think it’s important to understand ABSOLUTELY that Hawaiians have been FORCED to this extreme. Hawaiian people were not the ones to invent racism. Hawaiian people didn’t ever say “you’re this or that, so you get this and that.” In fact, the Hawaiian people said “whoever you are, we’ll take care of you because you’ve come from nowhere and have nothing and we have things to share.” The Hawaiian people held these foreigners up in the highest esteem and did everything to insure their comfort and success in our nation. They did this with the whole hearted belief that these people would share our love and become helpful and heartful contributors to the betterment of the whole Hawaiian society, which during the 1800s was growing to become what could have been today a world leader in social progress.
    That’s not where we are though and that has not been the world’s history. In fact much to the contrary, huge, rich, and European based nations have since the late 1400s gone around this whole world to rape and pillage resources from the ends of the earth. They commoditized resources such as HUMAN BEINGS and LAND by putting a price on these things, when we know such things are priceless. Historically, and from the Eurocentric viewpoint, colonization is over (of course we know that isn’t true). But at the end of what these rich countries called the period of colonization, when supposedly all colonized lands were made independent (in their view finalized during the 1960s in Africa), these same rich countries got together to “loan” all their “ex-colonies” some money through institutions like the IMF and the World Bank. After getting these countries substantially in debt, they pulled the rug out from underneath them, FORCING these countries to become dependent on the rich nations. You could call this “mass colonization of the world part II.” As part of the conditions of this dependency, almost EVERY NATION OF THE WORLD is FORCED to comply by the laws made by only a very few number of countries. In most cases, only 7 nations are making the rules for the whole world, the United States being the leader of those nations.

    What this has resulted in is the very exact same thing that was happening under world colonization. There are international agreements in place which bar countries from setting regulations and limits on pollution, workers rights, import/export tariffs that could protect these country’s economies in order that the rich nations may continue to strip these nations of whatever they want. The resulting poverty, lack of freedoms, and death around the world today is something ENORMOUS. When I say that, I’m talking about crisis – no joke – not to be taken lightly whatsoever. We’ve heard people talk about apocalypse, and really and truly, the possibility is on our doorstep.
    So what does this have to do with us and racism? Historically, from the Eurocentric viewpoint, it was the idea that people were “different” in some way from each other – SO DIFFERENT, that some people were and ARE believed to not feel as much pain as others, to not feel so tortured by poverty as a white person would be. This is one of the reasons why some people can be so heartless in their acts towards others, especially people with a simple difference in skin color. They don’t think we feel pain the same way as them - they really don’t – and I could cite articles written just this year in famous and highly acclaimed journals (journals whose advice will be taken by international policy makers) by numerous people denying the strength of feeling of those in third world countries. This is racism. People will miss out on the opportunities given to someone else, not because they’re not worthy or slightly less human, but because of their race. That’s racism. That’s just like what we’re doing now with the Akaka Bill. It’s racist...BUT we all know it’s the only direction we can go in order to survive – the real question is WHY are we having to be racists?

    It is the historical “pigeon holing,” the stuffing of people into a well framed box in the Eurocentric viewpoint that is the cause of all our own “racism” now. It is the historical struggle that nations throughout the world made to survive a deluge of empirical damage that FORCED us all to subsequently start to “climb a ladder” to another world. However, just as we all got going, the rich countries of the world kicked out a bar in the ladder they called RACE. It is that missing bar now in that ladder (A LADDER OF THE RICH COUNTRY’S OWN INVENTION) that we are FORCED to replace in order to survive the flood. We have been forced to identify race because that is an inherent piece of the game that has been SET UP BY OTHERS.

    I’ve read some clever arts of language among the Hawaiian people who have done such things as to flip the language of racism to say that we are not racist. They try to redefine what racism is to make it only fit the greedy, as though people in more strained circumstances could not be racists.

    In reality, however, I think we have caught the disease of racism. I still have never met a white person that I was willing to say loves Hawaii as much as I do. I couldn’t even think of it. Someone turned THIS Hawaiian into a racist, and I KNOW I’m not alone.

    My point in saying all this is many. First, I think Mr. Bush is right. The bill is racist. However, ironically, the racist country of America won’t vote for any other thing regarding the people of Hawaii that were so heinously ripped off. So don’t anyone worry when they hear George Bush railing us for our racism because racism is what all these representatives and senators love. They’ll practically vote it in just based on the racism alone (And they will too – the Akaka Bill is going to pass one of these days). George’s words, like so many others’, can do nothing to stop the racism. That’s what he gets for practically reinventing racism on a daily basis.

    What we should really be worrying about is this disease we’ve caught and how that affects our prospects for the future of the Hawaiian nation. Perhaps among others it serves us well to cover it up or to flip the terminology, but among ourselves, we should take a closer look. Like I mentioned above, the whole world is being destroyed, and I can’t emphasize enough that I’m not exaggerating. Theoretically ALL the Hawaiians in this world could be wiped out in a few weeks if we were all to get dropped in some of these countries where people are having to make like 8 kids each (on average!) just to keep their families going. That’s how few we are and how screwed up some places are getting. And these places are not isolated and far away. Like I said above, this is on our doorstep. We are going to need the people we love and that love us before long no matter what race they are in order for everything we love to survive. We should therefore be careful not to ignore this racism, no matter how enraging and hypocritical it sounds coming from someone like George Bush.

    Again, I don’t mean this to offend anyone. I’m not assuming all Hawaiians have turned into crazed racists, in fact, I believe the racism we hold does not run very deep to our true sentiments and I know Hawaiians that don’t show any racist feelings at all and are more than accepting of other people no matter their race. I am trying to say, though, that there is something in the Akaka Bill that IS racist and that we should be careful not to let that bill make us who we are, and on the contrary, carefully keep our eyes open to racism at all times AND especially when that bill goes through because the racism in that bill could undermine our efforts towards the very purpose of the bill which is to ensure the survival and wellbeing of everything Hawaiian.
    • Mahalo nui.
      I found your comments to be truly well thought out. In fact, this piece should serve as a model of how the people, all people should be thinking.

      An interesting thread you might read, nappaw.tribe.net/thread/11...8c843fbbb8
      The Lakota are declaring their independence. Can you imagine if Hawaii were to do the same?

      Okay, now let's give some thought to what has been said. It is true that prior to European takeover, Hawaiins, like many indigenous people, welcomed all with open arms. If you were willing to abide by the customs and learn the ways, then you would be considered one of them. When Europeans first came to the east coast, many found the indigenous way of life to be a better way. They left the colonies and joined the various tribes. This becamse so prevalent that the colonies created laws forbidding it. They then went to the tribes and requested the return of the colonists. When the tribes would not turn over the people, they were attacked. That was the old ways.
      Now, with blood quantums, federal recognition, casinos, this just isn't so. If I, as a white, chose to walk the good red road and turned to the Wampanoag or Narragansetts in my area, I would be turned away. In part because of what my people have done, in part because I carry no blood and cannot pass blood quantum measure, and in part because the theft of spritual practices such as the sweat lodge by New Agers and plastic shaman. They would not look beyond my skin and see into my heart.
      I believe that this is the same with many indigneous peoples, whether they are North American Indians, Mayans, Inka, or any of the other South and Central indigenous peoples, or Native Hawaiins. While some will see me and hear my words and know my heart, many will have a cold heart towards me simply because I was born white.
      Now the other side of the coin with regard to the racism in this bill, may actually be a holdover to the colonist days. Think of the old ways of the Hawaiin people. Back when they lived in a time of harmony and balance with all of life. Back when they saw the sacredness in everything. What if the limitation was not there? What happens if Native Hawaiins start to practice their customs and rituals more openly? What if some of the non-Native people on the island found a truth in that way and many decided to join with the Native Hawaiins? Now, whatever funding that comes from the government would have to be spread further. Not only that, but what if more and more found this way of life better than the constant driving for material gain? Then what happens if all these people came together as one voice, one heart, one spirit, and declared independence from the US as the Lakota are attempting to do?
      The control is there for a reason. Maybe only to limit who can or cannot be Hawaiin, but maybe also to limit the chance that many will come over to this way of life. We are at the crossroads. There are many indigneous leaders who are saying that it is the time of change. That it is time to come out and speak to the people. That the indigenous leaders must come forward and lead the people back to a more balanced and harmonious way of life where the people have respect for the Earth and all who live on it. What happens if more and more people join the indigenous people of the world and start learning the old ways? What happens then to the material world? What happens to those who perceive they have power simply because they have wealth? Personally, I would love to be able to step out of the rat race and get back in touch with all that is.
    • Unsu...
       
      I've been privileged to sit in on some pretty intense conversations about the legal aspects -- the lurking, hidden, legal aspects -- of the various versions of the Akaka bill and the conclusions many have come to is that it's just a way to complete the total land grab of Hawai'i, by getting the so-called "Native Hawaiians" to "re-organize" their government, supervised by a U.S. entity that is sure to be just as corrupt as the Bureau of Indian Affairs. (And talk about OHA -- there's a lot of controversy right now about the need for an audit, big time! The way that agency throws money around, that's not even theirs, is surely something that needs some looking into.)

      For one thing, the original Kingdom of Hawai'i still exists, in an internationally recognized legal state, and so the government does not need to be "re-organized." It IS. And it's occupied, illegally.

      And for another thing, the factor of descendants of Hawaiian nationals who are not Maoli is another thing. The Kingdom was multi-racial. The government (and land and everything else) was stolen from a rather diverse bunch of folks. The Akaka bill doesn't approach this can of worms either.

Recent topics in "Hawaiian Culture and Independence"